Executive pay, earnings manipulation and shareholder litigation
نویسندگان
چکیده
The paper examines the role of executive compensation in inducing management behavior that triggers private securities litigation. Incentive pay in the form of options is found to increase the probability of securities class action lawsuits, holding constant a wide range of other firm characteristics. In contrast, base pay levels and share ownership do not have a significant impact on lawsuit incidence. Our results suggest that option-based compensation may give executives too strong an incentive to target the short term share price, which may be harmful to long term shareholder value. We further identify earnings manipulation as an important channel linking compensation and litigation: incentive pay has a significant impact on earnings manipulation, which in turn significantly affects the probability of litigation. However, our accrual-based measure of manipulation does not capture the full impact of compensation on litigation, suggesting other channels are important. JEL classification: G30, G34, J33, K22, M41
منابع مشابه
Earnings Management from the Bottom Up: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives Below the CEO
Performance-based pay is an important instrument to align the interests of managers with the interests of shareholders. However, recent evidence suggests that high-powered incentives also provide managers with incentives to manipulate the firm's reported earnings. The previous literature has focused primarily on Chief Executive Officers, but managers further down in the firm hierarchy—division ...
متن کاملPay Convexity, Earnings Manipulation, and Project Continuation
This paper studies the optimal design of long-term executive pay plans when boards of directors use accounting information for investment decision-making and executives can take costly actions to manipulate this information. The model predicts that a shift to more convex executive pay plans, such as equity plans that rely more on options and less on stock, is associated with higher levels of ma...
متن کامل“ Does Shareholder Litigation Deter Insider Trading ? ” on
This paper examines the possible deterrent effect of actual shareholder litigation on insider trading behavior for both defendant firms and their industry peers. We construct a composite index to capture the strength of a lawsuit as reflected in its merits and the rigorousness of the litigation process. Using a large litigation sample from 1996 to 2009, we find a significant decrease in the int...
متن کاملDirectors' Incentives and Corporate Performance
We examine the effect of the incentives of the members of the board of directors on shareholder wealth, CEO compensation and the sensitivity of this compensation to corporate performance in laboratory setting. Two methods of appointing the board, one by the CEO and the other by the largest shareholder, constitute the main treatment. The board sets the compensation for the CEO, who makes product...
متن کاملExecutive Compensation and Earnings Management under Moral Hazard
This paper analyzes executive compensation in a setting where managers may take a costly action to manipulate corporate performance, and whether managers do so is stochastic. We examine how the opportunity to manipulate affects the optimal pay contract, and establish necessary and sufficient conditions under which earnings management occurs. Our model provides a set of implications on the role ...
متن کامل